<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>LEADership by Louis Foong - Latest Comments</title><link xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" rel="http://api.friendfeed.com/2008/03#sup" href="http://disqus.com/sup/all.sup#forumcomments-f1f3acaa" type="application/json"/><link>http://leadershipbylouisfoong.disqus.com/</link><description></description><atom:link href="http://leadershipbylouisfoong.disqus.com/comments.rss" rel="self"></atom:link><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Wed, 14 Dec 2011 13:49:59 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: Why Aren’t Your Sales People Following Up on Leads Provided by Marketing?</title><link>http://www.louisfoong.com/sales-people-following-up-on-leads-provided-by-marketing/#comment-386622212</link><description>The universal lead definition changes from company to company and sometimes from &lt;br&gt;year to year within the same company. Revisit the definition often, and each &lt;br&gt;time you hire a new employee, make sure they understand it. Publish the &lt;br&gt;definition and integrate it into your organization’s language and culture. It &lt;br&gt;doesn’t matter what your company calls a lead as long as it is meaningful to the &lt;br&gt;sales force.&lt;br&gt;Recently read this from an outside source and it makes sense to me....</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Gerrydee1</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 14 Dec 2011 13:49:59 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Why Aren’t Your Sales People Following Up on Leads Provided by Marketing?</title><link>http://www.louisfoong.com/sales-people-following-up-on-leads-provided-by-marketing/#comment-386542816</link><description>Hi Gerrydee,&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Thank you for your comment. Your point is a good&lt;br&gt;one as it demonstrates a need for a clearer definition of a lead. What you have&lt;br&gt;described is a list not a lead. Too many times listbrokers call their records "leads" and even end users use the word "leads" to describe records purchased. From&lt;br&gt;my perspective only a qualified prospect should be deemed a lead. Please read&lt;br&gt;my previous post as to what is a lead, it is universal across industry. We have not been&lt;br&gt;very good within the industry at not creating confusion as an inquiry is not a&lt;br&gt;lead and nor is a purchased list that is just a collection of records. Thank&lt;br&gt;you again for your comments and for reading.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Louis Foong</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 14 Dec 2011 12:00:09 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Why Aren’t Your Sales People Following Up on Leads Provided by Marketing?</title><link>http://www.louisfoong.com/sales-people-following-up-on-leads-provided-by-marketing/#comment-381997806</link><description>Usually the leads that are purchased or generated are the same leads sold to many companies. Therefore, the contact is receiving too many calls.  With caller ID today it is easy to be "weeded out".  The best leads with the help of the Internet, which may take a little more time, are leads a sales rep can generate within organizations, education, and government by job title, department, and needs that best interest the contact. Sales reps have to prospect for leads.  It is like digging for gold..not easy, but often the reward is great.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Gerrydee1</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 08 Dec 2011 08:26:40 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Lessons from Facebook Addicts</title><link>http://www.louisfoong.com/lessons-from-facebook-addicts/#comment-336643034</link><description>I have to be a Facebook addict! As a social media marketing coordinator, I have no choice but to be on it first thing and all day</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Puneet</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 17 Oct 2011 10:24:09 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Avoid Meaningless Metrics – Monitor Quality Leads Instead</title><link>http://www.louisfoong.com/avoid-meaningless-metrics-monitor-quality-leads-instead/#comment-320844788</link><description>Thanks for your comment. There must be some type of balance but unfortunately, the right balance isn't always achieved. I agree that it starts at the top with the leaders and organizational culture.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Louis Foong</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 27 Sep 2011 08:57:42 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Inbound Web Conversion</title><link>http://www.louisfoong.com/inbound-web-conversion/#comment-320844263</link><description>Thanks for your comment Richard. How is your project going? I am always interested in real life experiences as you indicated.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Louis Foong</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 27 Sep 2011 08:56:42 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Effectiveness of Social Media Marketing for B2B – The Debate Rages On</title><link>http://www.louisfoong.com/effectiveness-of-social-media-marketing-for-b2b-the-debate-rages-on/#comment-309271250</link><description>50/50</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Seeyinhowtue</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 14 Sep 2011 00:17:32 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Avoid Meaningless Metrics – Monitor Quality Leads Instead</title><link>http://www.louisfoong.com/avoid-meaningless-metrics-monitor-quality-leads-instead/#comment-308651594</link><description>I agree with you Mr Foong. Eventually, it is not about quantity but quality. In a typical B2B setting, one should focus on the solutions and outcomes more as opposed to the data analysis of every event. One should not disregard quantitative analysis but it would be better if organisations focused more on their long term objectives rather than going back in time too much. Long termism should win over short termism. Bu tthen at the end of the day, it is all to do with the organisational culture and the leaders.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">S.Raman</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 13 Sep 2011 10:56:19 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Inbound Web Conversion</title><link>http://www.louisfoong.com/inbound-web-conversion/#comment-272274663</link><description>Fascinating blog articles - many thanks for sharing.&lt;br&gt;We are starting what we call a web optimsation conversion project that covers many of the sentiments and points you cover in this article. I'll try and keep you posted on how it progresses since real life experiences should shine a lot of light on whether Inbound Web Conversion has a future.&lt;br&gt;Richard McCartney</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Rmccartney</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 01 Aug 2011 04:24:07 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Can a small company think ‘big’ when it comes to B2B lead generation?</title><link>http://www.louisfoong.com/can-a-small-company-think-%e2%80%98big%e2%80%99-when-it-comes-to-b2b-lead-generation/#comment-225130683</link><description>Lead management continues to be a hot topic in the world of B2B marketing. Working with a Lead Management Software is certainly a terrific application to supply the company a great chance to move forward from a small one to a big one.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Princess Shane</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 13 Jun 2011 19:43:21 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: When it comes to Effective Lead Generation&amp;#8230;Less is More</title><link>http://www.louisfoong.com/when-it-comes-to-effective-lead-generation-less-is-more/#comment-197295106</link><description>I agree with Loui!!! Exactly right</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Linc</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 04 May 2011 23:14:20 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Social Media and B2B Lead Generation…A definite work in progress</title><link>http://www.louisfoong.com/social-media-and-b2b-lead-generation-a-definite-work-in-progress/#comment-183766278</link><description>Hi Louis, &lt;br&gt;Great blog and an interesting post on SM &amp;amp; B2B. I tend to find that social media as a B2B lead generation tool is a great qualifier in terms of lead quality (sales ready and hand-raiser). The whole point of the social media argument is that the prospect can approach us when ready not be forced into the sales process. Why? Because many B2B prospects, particularly IT decision-makers, will have completed much of their purchasing research process (hopefully with our content!) online before they decide to engage. As a result when we get a response over a social media platform it is invariably from a sales ready prospect. &lt;br&gt;Best Wishes, Andrew.&lt;br&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Andrew Vance</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 13 Apr 2011 10:54:18 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: A 10-Point Checklist for Achieving Marketing Leadership</title><link>http://www.louisfoong.com/a-10-point-checklist-for-achieving-marketing-leadership/#comment-158737283</link><description>"Do you always remember that technology is only a driver of change and not change itself?"&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Technology and change is so all around us, we may need to be reminded of the above often.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">George</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 01 Mar 2011 20:31:05 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: A “Do Not Bug” Registry for Social Media?</title><link>http://www.louisfoong.com/a-do-not-bug-registry-for-social-media/#comment-145379291</link><description>Activities create results as you know. Polling customers face to face can also be done online through a network of connections on Twitter. A list of followers is no different then a list of prospective customers that are being called through traditional telemarketing. No difference. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;The question I would ask your clients is where are THEIR customers? How do they prefer to be communicated and promoted to. The good news is there are more ways to make connections then just calling people on the phone.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Chris Herbert of Mi6</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 12 Feb 2011 13:53:28 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: A “Do Not Bug” Registry for Social Media?</title><link>http://www.louisfoong.com/a-do-not-bug-registry-for-social-media/#comment-139793951</link><description>Great point Chris, I am still trying to ascertain the value of Twitter in the B2B space. Hollywood types for sure as they need to stay in the limelight but B2B, not so sure. I do a lot of informal polling of clients at functional level and NO ONE has time to follow and tweet and if they do, they are paying someone in the background for content. The point is are we confusing activities with results?</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Lfoong</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 03 Feb 2011 15:22:35 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: A “Do Not Bug” Registry for Social Media?</title><link>http://www.louisfoong.com/a-do-not-bug-registry-for-social-media/#comment-136229948</link><description>An interesting thought Louis. One of the mechanisms available to us all in social media is the unfollow, unfriend and unconnect features in Twitter, Facebook and Linkedin. It's not a formal do not bug registry but it can act as a means to accomplish what you've outlined in your post.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Chris Herbert of Mi6</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 28 Jan 2011 17:17:05 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: The Ideal Demand Generation Personality Profile</title><link>http://www.louisfoong.com/the-ideal-demand-generation-personality-profile/#comment-135989250</link><description>Liana, thank you for your comment. Dashboarding is important.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Lfoong</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 28 Jan 2011 09:54:10 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: The Ideal Demand Generation Personality Profile</title><link>http://www.louisfoong.com/the-ideal-demand-generation-personality-profile/#comment-135565685</link><description>Terrific advice as always. I would add that a good demand generation expert is also able to effectively measure his or her progress and apply what he or she has learned. This way, you know how much progress you have made and are better able to "move with the times" as you say.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">LianaLingWSI</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 27 Jan 2011 16:02:02 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: New Year’s Resolutions for 2011</title><link>http://www.louisfoong.com/new-year-resolutions-for-2011/#comment-128954712</link><description>Happy New Year Louis!&lt;br&gt;Raj</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Rajinder</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 14 Jan 2011 00:52:36 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: The expanding social landscape &amp;#8211; integral to lead generation?</title><link>http://www.louisfoong.com/the-expanding-social-landscape-integral-to-lead-generation/#comment-97892099</link><description>Great post! Any ideas about how a social technology tool like LinkedIn can be better utilized for lead generation? Examples would be wonderful too, if you have any.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Sheetal</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 16 Nov 2010 12:23:17 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Social Media for Demand Generation: Silver Bullet or Snake Oil?</title><link>http://www.louisfoong.com/social-media-for-demand-generation-silver-bullet-or-snake-oil-2/#comment-94883539</link><description>Social media is becoming a huge marketing tool.  I think it will stay on the rise too due to the increased usage and easy access to the internet.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Brett Widmann</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 07 Nov 2010 20:16:58 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Broad based demand vs. tiering: which to choose?</title><link>http://www.louisfoong.com/broad-based-demand-vs-tiering-which-to-choose/#comment-70615331</link><description>Louis, enjoyed reading this article, as I do with all of the rest of  your articles. I recently started working at The Alea Group and being a Marketing Grad myself, reading your articles puts elements in perspective. I agree that a tier-based approach to marketing enables a business organization to capitalize on the most market opportunities as well as minimize risks to a certain level.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Shehab Hasan</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 22 Aug 2010 13:18:03 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: The Best Mailing List for B2B Lead Generation</title><link>http://www.louisfoong.com/the-best-mailing-list-for-b2b-lead-generation/#comment-63194016</link><description>good job with the post, thanks for the info on b2b! keep up the content</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Underground Elephant</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 19 Jul 2010 10:54:06 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Uniting Sales and Marketing Under One Umbrella</title><link>http://www.louisfoong.com/uniting-sales-and-marketing-under-one-umbrella/#comment-61704999</link><description>In my experience, this disconnect happens at the top with senior execs not understanding how marketing and sales can - and should, work together to grow the business. Symptoms of this disconnect are: 1. sales and marketing plans are crafted in isolation (or not at all), 2. there is no shared accountability for performance targets, 3. role ambiguity - sales is doing marketing and marketing is doing sales, 4. little or no collaboration on targeting, bids, implementation, post-sale customer care. The list goes on... You need a top-down approach to change this mind-set or sales will continue to chase "leads" and marketing will continue to churn out pretty brochures that miss the mark.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Paul Yetman</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 12 Jul 2010 08:40:39 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>
